Verisk Analytics – Gender Identity Non-Discrimination (2017)

Outcome: Successfully withdrawn after company committed to revising its Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to include discrimination protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity.

WHEREAS:
Verisk Analytics (Verisk) does not explicitly prohibit discrimination based on gender identity or gender expression in its written employment policy;
According to the Human Rights Campaign Foundation’s 2016 survey, 75 percent of Fortune 500 companies prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity or expression, a historic high.
We believe that corporations that prohibit discrimination on the basis of gender identity or expression have a competitive advantage in recruiting and retaining employees from the widest talent pool;
According to an analysis of surveys conducted by the Williams Institute at the UCLA School of Law, sixteen to sixty eight percent of LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender) people report experiencing employment discrimination. Ninety percent of transgender individuals have encountered some form of harassment or mistreatment in the workplace;
Although federal law does not provide sexual orientation and gender identity employment discrimination protection, eighteen states, the District of Columbia, and more than 225 cities and counties have laws prohibiting employment discrimination based on gender identity or expression;
In July 2014, the White House signed an amendment to an existing Executive Order covering companies that are federal contractors. The Executive Order explicitly prohibits federal contractors from discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. In issuing the order the President stated, “equality in the workplace is not only the right thing to do, it turns out to be good business.  That’s why a majority of Fortune 500 companies already have nondiscrimination policies in place.”
Verisk and its subsidiaries operate in several states that do not provide discrimination protections based on gender identity such as Texas, South Carolina, and Ohio.
Verisk may be lagging behind peers with comprehensive equal employment opportunity policies. According to the Human Rights Campaign, many companies in the computer and data services industry, such as Automatic Data Processing, FactSet, Dropbox, and Nielsen explicitly prohibit discrimination based on gender identity or expression in their written policies.
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that Verisk amend its written equal employment opportunity policy to explicitly prohibit discrimination based gender identity or expression and to take concrete action to implement the policy.
Supporting Statement: We believe employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity diminishes employee morale and productivity. Because state and local laws are not comprehensive with respect to prohibiting employment discrimination, our company would benefit from a comprehensive, consistent, corporate-wide policy  to enhance efforts to prevent discrimination, resolve complaints internally, access employees from the broadest talent pool, and ensure a respectful and supportive atmosphere for all employees. We believe Verisk will enhance its competitive edge by joining the growing ranks of companies guaranteeing equal opportunity for all employees.